This doesn't bother me at all. I don't really care that it is starting hormone replacement therapy. That doesn't change how I feel about it.
Does that make me panromantic?
Because I don't care it uses it/its pronouns, I don't care it is agender, I don't care that it is transgender (female to male), I don't care that it is starting hormone replacement therapy, but more often than not, I like male. So I can't be panromantic, right? Because panromantic is "emotional and romantic attraction to others regardless of their gender and sex", but more often than not I like males, but at the same time, I do not care what you are or what's in your pants, as long as you aren't an asshat of a person I'll be attracted to you, but if there was a lineup of people I'd pick a male or male presenting person despite the fact I find everyone attractive regardless of what they are or present as.
Maybe it fits me, because my attraction to males is less about their gender and sex and more about the role they take on in the relationship, which is typically dominant.
But pansexual/panromantic is usually about EQUAL attraction across all genders and sexes, but my attraction to different genders and sexes is different…
The best I can describe it is that sometimes I like women, sometimes I like men, sometimes I like people under the non-binary umbrella, but more often than not I like men, mainly because of the relationship dynamic. Men and males (of any gender) are typically more dominant and rough, and so I take on a more submissive and bubbly dynamic myself, and with women and females (of any gender), they are much softer and delicate, so I take on a dominant role myself. That doesn't NECESSARILY sound equal to me, but maybe that's an armory thing and not an attraction thing??? I don't know, man…
— Mauze (she/her + they/them)